Potentially Habitable Exoplanet Found Orbiting Red Dwarf Gliese 163

European astronomers using ESO’s HARPS planet finder have discovered a new super-Earth in the habitable zone around the red dwarf star Gliese 163.

Artist’s rendition of Gliese 163c (PHL @ UPR Arecibo)

Dubbed Gliese 163c, the planet – with a mass of 6.9 times that of Earth and an orbital period of 26 days – orbits a red dwarf star 49 light years away in the Dorado constellation.

The team has also detected a larger planet, Gliese 163b, orbiting the star much closer with 9 day period. An additional third, but unconfirmed planet, might be orbiting the star much farther away.

The new exoplanets are described in a paper submitted to the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Gliese 163c could have a size between 1.8 to 2.4 Earth radii, depending if it is composed mostly of rock or water, respectively. It receives on average 40 % more light from its parent star than Earth from the Sun, making it hotter.

“We don’t know the properties of the atmosphere of Gliese 163c but, if we assume that it is a scaled up version of Earth’s atmosphere, then its surface temperature might be around 60°C,” the researchers said.

The red dwarf Gliese 163 (Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg / SIMBAD)

The potential for habitability of planets around red dwarf stars has been an issue of much debate. Tidal effects on planets around these stars might cause extra surface heating or even tidal locking. Also, these stars are more active and their stellar wind might erode planetary atmospheres much faster. These factors might preclude the potential for life on smaller planets but not for planets with thicker atmospheres, something expected for superterran planets.

“NASA’s Kepler Mission has detected about 27 potential habitable exoplanets candidates out of their over 2,300 exoplanets that are waiting to be confirmed. Some of these bodies seem very Earth-like. Unfortunately, they are much farther away from us than Gliese 163 and it will be nearly impossible to determine if they are really habitable worlds by future observations.”

“However, the statistical analysis of Kepler data suggests that these planets are very common in the galaxy. Therefore, many more Earth-like worlds are waiting to be discovered in our solar neighborhood too, such as Gliese 163c.”

  • zorrrro

    lol we need one much closer…….next

    • ahmed r.

      Gliese 581 g is known to be Earth-like and only 22 light-years away

      • Bajey

        On Mondays, it takes me longer to get out of bed.

        • Dave

          You realize a light year is distance, not time, right?

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001055387438 Scott Young

            Its time and distance… how far light travels in a year… A year is time and the length of travel is distance… We could also include speed…

          • Kevin

            No it’s definitely a measure of distance. It’s 946073047258800 metres

          • redscream5

            Definitely only distance.
            It defines a length of travel by using a velocity constant (the speed of light) multiplied by a time constant (the average earth year). Think of it like we do Km/h. KM/h is used to describe the velocity, because you already have the distance and time variables set in stone. Lightyear is sort of the same, only it describes distance because we have the velocity and time variables set instead.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001055387438 Scott Young

            Well now since we are talking physics, and physics is the basic science…. Meaning the basics of everything…. States then that in order to calculate the distance light travels in a year, you need to take into consideration the “Time” and “Distance” it has taken that light to get to said point. Now we know the speed of light is put into a nice little mathematical formula… But you shouldn’t ever discount the initial “Basics” of anythings nature… After all, Science is a theory… Ones in which we are making new discoveries continually that challenge the previous methodologies and ideological theories that previous human reasoning could allow….

  • WrangVoo

    This makes a lot of sene dude WOw

    Anon-IP.tk

  • Daniel Walker

    If I were an intelligent organism looking to expand my empire to other potentially inhabitable planets I would load up frozen rocks with bacteria and dna and launch it across space in every direction.. (probably by waiting for my own planets sun to die, the crust to freeze and the core explode) then in a few billion years wait for someone to send out a signal and go take over it. (Meanwhile I’d probably explore the reaches of space in a self contained and manageable ecosystem). At least then I’d know its inhabitable and survived the test of time. Now.. how do I become an intelligent organism..

    • satuon

      You would be one very patient intelligent organism.

    • nappy

      If there is life on another planet, we don’t want it to be something from our earth man.. Its a funny thought, but we don’t to inject our earth bacteria to other planets, we want to find new intelligence not re-plant earthlings. Cuz i tell you, we suck

      • redscream5

        It’s just as likely that we are the norm, and all sentient life sucks.

    • http://twitter.com/Ask_A_Physicist Ask A Physicist

      If you were an intelligent organism I’m sure you’d find better things to do with the billions of years of your apparent life span then mindlessly expanding yourself.

    • astazangasta

      Clearly you haven’t done the math. The odds of hitting a habitable system by just randomly shooting out rocks are incredibly small. For example, the odds of hitting the Earth from the Sun using this method are 4.5e-10. Space is vast and empty. If they do hit something, it is much, much more likely that your rocks will hit a sun and burn up into nothing than that they will land on the surface of a likely planet and flourish.

    • Hunter

      This sounds a lot like the book Leviathan Wakes by James S.A. Corey…

  • Pawel

    Heavier planet inside its orbit will work like a magnet for all kinds of mass traveling the mother star system. So it should be expected the surface of this planet to be more of our moon kind – heavily sculptured by meteorites. Now if the massive planet was on further orbit like in our system where we have this great vacuum cleaner just over asteroid fields – securing our planet from cosmic trash ..

    • rohanrsingh

      I’m not sure if you’re appreciating how sparse and vast space really is compared to the objects that inhabit it. A gas giant can provide the “vacuum cleaner” effect even if it orbits closer to a star than a smaller, rocky companion. The likelihood of debris that’s been attracted by the gas giant hitting the rocky planet is astronomically small.

  • Cam

    So a mass of 6.9 times the Earth, and a radius between 1.8 and 2.4. So gravity could be anywhere from 1.2 to 2.1 times Earth gravity. Or are there other factors I’m not taking into account?

    • Lenigod

      It’s mostly about mass, then it is size. The bigger plannet could be made out of something with less mass, or greater mass then what earth is. However, if it’s composition is similar to earth, then yeah, it’s pretty much about size at that point.

    • ಠ◡ಠ

      If Goku can do it, I can too.

  • Big Johnson

    “Meanwhile In Stoopid America: America is more stoopid every day. Go Yurop!”
    These thinly-veiled snipes are getting old and tiresome.

    • Unpatriotic Douchebag

      I think you meant ‘Stupid’ and ‘Europe’. Can’t Americans spell anything properly?

  • http://www.clubvalenciacf.blogspot.com SlickR

    How is it habitable if its 60 degrees Celsius there?

    • Cam

      When they say habitable, they are not always referring to being habitable for human life. Take the case of thermophiles, which can survive at temp ranges up to roughly 120 degrees Celsius. The point is that, it’s within a temperature range at which proteins and other biological compounds won’t necessarily denature, so life could possibly arise on that planet.

    • http://twitter.com/Ask_A_Physicist Ask A Physicist

      There have been 50 degree summers on earth

  • kyle mvavoy

    Lies……