Universe’s Largest Structure Discovered

A multinational team of astronomers led by the University of Central Lancashire has detected a large group of quasars that may be the largest known structure in the Universe.

This image shows the Huge-LQG in the constellation Leo, white crosses mark the positions of quasars (Roger G. Clowes et al / Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg / SIMBAD)

Quasars are the nuclei of galaxies from the early days of the Universe that undergo brief periods of extremely high brightness that make them visible across huge distances. Astronomers know that quasars tend to group together in clumps of surprisingly large sizes, forming large quasar groups (LQGs).

The newly discovered structure, named the Huge-LQG, is a group of 73 quasars located in the constellation Leo. It is so large that it would take a vehicle traveling at the speed of light some 4 billion years to cross it.

According to the astronomers, the discovery also challenges the Cosmological Principle – the assumption that the Universe, when viewed at a sufficiently large scale, looks the same no matter where you are observing it from.

The modern theory of cosmology is based on the work of Albert Einstein, and depends on the assumption of the Cosmological Principle. The Principle is assumed but has never been demonstrated observationally beyond reasonable doubt.

To give some sense of scale, whole clusters of galaxies can be 2-3 Megaparsecs across, but LQGs can be 200 Megaparsecs or more across. Based on the Cosmological Principle and the modern theory of cosmology, calculations suggest that scientists should not be able to find a structure larger than 370 Megaparsecs.

The Huge-LQG however has a typical dimension of 500 Megaparsecs. But because it is elongated, its longest dimension is 1200 Megaparsecs – some 1600 times larger than the distance from the Milky Way to Andromeda.

“While it is difficult to fathom the scale of this LQG, we can say quite definitely it is the largest structure ever seen in the entire Universe. This is hugely exciting – not least because it runs counter to our current understanding of the scale of the Universe,” said Dr Roger Clowes of the University of Central Lancashire Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, lead author of the study accepted for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (arXiv.org version).

“Even travelling at the speed of light, it would take 4 billion light years to cross. This is significant not just because of its size but also because it challenges the Cosmological Principle, which has been widely accepted since Einstein. Our team has been looking at similar cases which add further weight to this challenge and we will be continuing to investigate these fascinating phenomena.”

_______

Bibliographic information: Roger G. Clowes et al. 2013. A structure in the early universe at z ∼ 1.3 that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-W concordance cosmology. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., accepted for publication; arXiv:1211.6256

  • Yogesh Sharma

    A Great Discovery in modern Astro Science………..

  • http://holographicgalaxy.blogspot.com/ Jim Nelson

    Hyperclusters found by shawn thomas stretch over 3 billion light years, and when this is taken into account with quasar groups stretching 4 billion light years, it seems foolish to try to protect modern cosmology. A much larger and older universe clearly exists. As a Geologist who thinks in time frames of billions of years, the planet earth is accurately dated by radioactivity to be 4.5 billion years old, but the entire universe is accepted to be only about 14.6 billion years old, despite innumerable new challenges. Beyond our visible horizon, change in space can be dramatic, far from being homogenous like the cosmological principle. Dark energy seems to be related to negative absolute temperatures that are actually hotter than infinite temps. Our tiny big-bang is not the entire universe.

  • Robert Oldershaw

    Let’s be accurate. It is the standard LCDM cosmological model, with its “homogeneity” assumption, finite Universe, and “WIMP” dark matter that is being falsified.

    Einstein’s General Relativity is still highly supported by all empirical
    evidence, but a less idealized version of the cosmological principle is clearly
    needed, as pointed out by Mandelbrot and others decades ago.

    We are seeing the gradual unveiling of a new discrete fractal model of the
    cosmos, and one that probably has no upper or lower bounds to its self-similar
    hierarchy, i.e., no largest or smallest systems in nature, but rather an
    infinite hierarchy of systems.

    This represents the biggest change in cosmological paradigms in 100 years, or
    possibly 400 years, depending on how you view Einstein’s Special and General
    Relativity ( as a correction to the Newtonian paradigm, or as a completely new
    paradigm).

    Robert L. Oldershaw
    http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
    Discrete Scale Relativity
    Fractal Cosmology

    • http://holographicgalaxy.blogspot.com/ Jim Nelson

      All dark matter models suffer serious damage. Einstein’s relativity is analogous to superconductivity equations. The electric field is conventional gravity. Gravity is a pseudo force in relativity. Extreme cold, vacuum, will make all atoms superconductors of electricity. Cosmic scale magnetic fields are associated with electric currents, and like the sun, a new model besides gravity can explain stellar formation. The sun’s electric current sheet is humongous. Most astronomers now see magnetic fields as largely responsible for star formation. Liquid helium mimics black holes, having quantum vortices, and an exotic phase change from liquid to solid, very near absolute zero. Piezoelectric metamaterials alone do much of what black holes do. I doubt this is just a coincidence in labs. Protostar cores condense and are seen to form inside very cold plasma filaments. Solid hydrogen has been detected in the interstellar medium as a glow around nebulas. Solid hydrogen with dusty impurities magnetically levitates around liquid helium, like a disk shaped galaxy.

      The fractal cosmology of Oldershaw is reputable, but often ignored by foolish mainstream cosmologists. It’s time more people took a look at what Oldershaw has been writing. Fractal self-similar phenomena comprise the universe. Dust, plasma, EM fields, shape atoms, stars, nebula, galaxies, superclusters… Probably to no ultimate size scale.

  • Kane Breitzke

    I’m not an astrophysicist or university student “damm, I didn’t complete year 10 :S” but where it says “Even travelling at the speed of light, it would take 4 billion light years to cross.” Shouldn’t it say “it would take 4 billion years to cross” not “light years” ??? Just asking, I find this sort of thing interesting and that does not sound right because a light year refers to distance not time..
    Otherwise this article is still very interesting ;) thanks for the read…

    • Keith

      I was thinking the same thing.