Viruses Can Have Immune System, Study Finds

A new research led by Dr Kimberley Seed from the Tufts University School of Medicine provides the first evidence that bacteriophages – viruses that infect and replicate within bacteria – can acquire a wholly functional and adaptive immune system.

Electron micrograph of bacteriophages infecting a bacterial cell (Dr Graham Beards)

Electron micrograph of bacteriophages infecting a bacterial cell (Dr Graham Beards)

The study, published today in the journal Nature, finds that a viral predator of the cholera bacteria can steal the functional immune system of bacteria and use it against its bacterial host. The bacteriophage (phage for short) used the stolen immune system to disable – and thus overcome – the cholera bacteria’s defense system against phages. Therefore, the phage can kill the cholera bacteria and multiply to produce more phage offspring, which can then kill more cholera bacteria.

The discovery has dramatic implications for phage therapy, which is the use of phages to treat bacterial diseases. Developing phage therapy is particularly important because some bacteria, called superbugs, are resistant to most or all current antibiotics.

Until now, scientists thought phages existed only as primitive particles of DNA or RNA and therefore lacked the sophistication of an adaptive immune system, which is a system that can respond rapidly to a nearly infinite variety of new challenges. Phages are viruses that prey exclusively on bacteria and each phage is parasitically mated to a specific type of bacteria. This study focused on a phage that attacks Vibrio cholerae, the bacterium responsible for cholera epidemics in humans.

The researchers used phage lacking the adaptive immune system to infect a new strain of cholera bacteria that is naturally resistant to the phage. The phage was unable to adapt to and kill the cholera strain. They next infected the same strain of cholera bacteria with phage harboring the immune system, and observed that the phage rapidly adapted and thus gained the ability to kill the cholera bacteria. This work demonstrates that the immune system harbored by the phage is fully functional and adaptive.

Bacteriophage structure (Adenosine / Pbroks13 / CC BY-SA 2.5)

Bacteriophage structure (Adenosine / Pbroks13 / CC BY-SA 2.5)

“Virtually all bacteria can be infected by phages. About half of the world’s known bacteria have this adaptive immune system, called CRISPR/Cas, which is used primarily to provide immunity against phages. Although this immune system was commandeered by the phage, its origin remains unknown because the cholera bacterium itself currently lacks this system. What is really remarkable is that the immune system is being used by the phage to adapt to and overcome the defense systems of the cholera bacteria. Finding a CRISPR/Cas system in a phage shows that there is gene flow between the phage and bacteria even for something as large and complex as the genes for an adaptive immune system,” Dr Seed said.

“The study lends credence to the controversial idea that viruses are living creatures, and bolsters the possibility of using phage therapy to treat bacterial infections, especially those that are resistant to antibiotic treatment,” added senior author Prof Andrew Camilli, also from the Tufts University School of Medicine.

______

Bibliographic information: Seed KD et al. 2013. A bacteriophage encodes its own CRISPR/Cas adaptive response to evade host innate immunity. Nature, vol. 494, no. 7438, pp. 489–491; doi: 10.1038/nature11927

  • modevs

    No comments… Everyone is too freaked out thinking about the massive biological warfare going on inside their bodies.

    • texastea2

      Does not freak me out,but it is weird when you think that you are in charge of your life and making decisions and then you realize that we are basically a body controlled by bacteria and would perish very rapidly without the trillions of bacteria.Then you wonder if the bacteria are really somehow coaxing us to get that drink of water or go for a jog.Perhaps it all serves the bacteria in some way? Sometimes I do get pretty medicated though!LOL We do believe however,that no cell in the human body is older than 10 years old so who knows?

  • texastea2

    I was not aware that there was a debate over whether or not virus was a living creature.What else could it possibly be? Any answers would be appreciated. It lives dies multiplies I am confused what did they think it could be if not a form of LIFE? Somebody PLEASE explain this.

    • http://twitter.com/abaseman A Bass Man

      It doesn’t metabolize- on it’s own, anyway. It’s not a cell. It’s missing ribosomes. No ATP. It’s like life Jr. But I guess the big thing is that a bacteria can reproduce given only molecule sized nutrients, and a virus can not. It needs another cell’s systems.

      Of course, a human can’t reproduce alone, either.
      .
      .
      .

      (You need two)

      • texastea2

        Why would it have to be a cell?What is ATP? What is like life and who is jr? Thanks for the time but I still do not understand> If science thought a virus is not living what on earth did they think it was? Similar to life If it is not life how did they explain its multiplying and growing? Magic?

    • SubvertAParadigm

      ‘Living’ has a specific definition. Something considered living has its own capacity for metabolism, reaction to stimuli, reproduction, etc, without hijacking the systems of other organisms. Viruses currently do not fit the seven criteria for life. They undergo a mechanical process of replication, not reproduction, and this is not possible at all without the machinery of a specific host cell.

      • texastea2

        Seems to me they missed on their specific definition then because if most children seen virus growing in a dish they would recognize it as living real quick.Seems to me once scientist seen a virus in action it wouldn’t take long for the debate to be over on whether it is living or not.Strange as it might be it is obviously life

        • http://twitter.com/general_waste degeneral

          You cannot grow viruses in a dish. They don’t grow by themselves; as mentioned before on their own they are inert. Protein coat and nucleic acids inside (sometimes wrapped in a membrane) -that’s all what a virus is.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

          • texastea2

            Thanks I am slowly learning a litle on subject when I have time.I still do not understand how one can think a virus is not a form of life. It cannot exist on it’s own.Can anything exist on it’s own? Even bacteria need energy I would presume.I understand that a virus is not a cell cannot replicate without a host. Why is that not allowed to be life? I am just a construction man so I am lost on this one.Might not be what we call life but who are we? I can tell you one thing IT ISN”T DEAD.LOL A rock is non living even though there is a good chance it has life forms in it.The rock itself will never move around and find something to insert it’s nucleic acid rna dna (whatever it might be on another world could be totally different).The rock will never seek out and kill another organism.If you do not call a virus a form of life(as stated before) seems to me one should immediately take another look at one’s definition of life. Is there anything else that humans know of that is “inert” but I thought inert meant not able to move anything much less insert something into a lifeform and reproduce.Something else non-living that can do what this virus can? Something inert?
            Damn life is fascinating ! Apparently non life as well.I thought non life was like iron or platinum. Thanks again I wish I had more time to study this but when I can I will Have a great day

      • Uriel Angel

        A virus looks like and behaves like a robot. It’s amazing that even though they’re not living entities they somehow know their way around the complicated machinary of the cell so as they can hijack it to reproduce virus copies.

  • Randommicro

    @texastea2 Currently there are 7 signs that we look for to describe life. They can be remembered with via MRS GREN, or movement, respiration, sensitivity, growth, reproduction, excretion, and nutrition. Virus particles lack respiration, but an argument can be made for virus particles fulfilling all the other criteria. Virus particles (the things part that infects cells) bud out from dying cells. What if we stepped back and instead thought of the infected cell as the virus? The budding virus particles could be thought of as the “offspring” and are just in a different stage of life, much like caterpillars undergoing metamorphosis to become butterflies.

    • texastea2

      If it was not considered life what DID they call it?From a laymans perspective it seems to me if I put some virus in a dish under certain conditions and it GROWS it would seem something is living.Are there things on the mocroscopic level that grow and can kill that are NOT living? I understand it might be a strange form of LIFE but what else could it be?Why is repiration necessary?
      Let me see if I understand better. The virus infects a host cell and replicates itself in the host cell in turn killing the host? What is so stange about that? Is something not considered life if it has to use some host in order to replicate? I apologize for being so ignorant on the subject but I can’t know every subject and this one just caught my attention.Thanks for your time and wisdom

      • FakeName

        It would be called non-living. The definition for life is what it is, a definition used to group things in one box or the other. But it is formulated as it is for a reason as not all things that move and grow are alive. Take crystals for example, have a look at them under a microscope. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEXYHJ5ZjM8 At the very small, what is killing? And when is it just an enzyme making the same turn over and over because it can do nothing else?

        • texastea2

          Thanks faker I am still not so sure about the def of life then.Looks to me but I know nothing but looks like the copper crystals could have been some form of (what we would call) primitive life that eats and grows and dies when there is no more nutrients available and copper is the remaining skeleton sort of like coral. What is killing good question now I will be thinking at work ,just not about workLOL

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1520687715 Paula Graham

    could not this be used in lyme disease defense?

  • taco

    i think viruses are like turtles

  • Taskman

    The cartoon is inaccurate, the DNA should actually be RNA.

  • ozspeaksup

    Russian knew and proved and used phage therapy decades ago.,
    while the west tut tutted and dissed it.