Study Links Low Levels of Vitamin D to Longevity

Nov 6, 2012 by Sergio Prostak

According to a new study led by Dr Diana van Heemst of the Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands, low levels of vitamin D may be associated with familial longevity.

“We found that familial longevity was associated with lower levels of vitamin D and a lower frequency of allelic variation in the CYP2R1 gene, which was associated with higher levels of vitamin D,” Dr van Heemst and her team said in a paper published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Previous works have shown that low levels of vitamin D are associated with increased rates of death, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, allergies, mental illness and other afflictions. However, it is not known whether low levels are the cause of these diseases or if they are a consequence.

The team looked at data from 380 white families with at least 2 siblings over age 90 in the Leiden Longevity Study to determine whether there was an association between vitamin D levels and longevity. The study involved the siblings, their offspring and their offsprings’ partners for a total of 1038 offspring and 461 controls. The children of the nonagenarians were included because it is difficult to include controls for the older age group.

The researchers measured levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, a prehormone that is produced in the liver by hydroxylation of vitamin D, and categorized levels by month as they varied according to season. The researchers controlled for age, sex, body mass index, time of year, vitamin supplementation and kidney function, all factors that can influence vitamin D levels. They also looked at the influence of genetic variation in 3 genes associated with vitamin D levels.

“We found that the offspring of nonagenarians who had at least 1 nonagenarian sibling had lower levels of vitamin D than controls, independent of possible confounding factors and single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with vitamin D levels,” the team said. “We also found that the offspring had a lower frequency of common genetic variants in the CYP2R1 gene; a common genetic variant of this gene predisposes people to high vitamin D levels.”

“The findings support an association between low vitamin D levels and familial longevity,” the researchers concluded.

_______

Bibliographic information: Raymond Noordam et al. Levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in familial longevity: the Leiden Longevity Study. CMAJ, first published online November 5, 2012; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.120233

  • Jack

    I think the study is flawed because survival ship bias in
    the control group. Think about this. If the control group has an average age of
    x years, then people who might not have lived to x years because of low D3
    levels would be excluded. Then the survivors (control group) would then have an
    above average D level compared to the test group who would have been
    predisposed due to genetics to have a higher survival rate for a given D3
    level. This would then mean the conclusions are completely the wrong way round.

  • Jack

    I think the Dutch study may be flawed because survival ship bias in
    the control group. Think about this. If the control group has an average age of
    x years, then people who might not have lived to x years because of low D3
    levels would be excluded. Then the survivors (control group) would then have an
    above average D level compared to the test group who would have been
    predisposed due to genetics to have a higher survival rate for a given D3
    level. This would then mean the conclusions are completely the wrong way round.

  • Shenaniganz08

    You are flawed in your understanding of the results

    From the Article

    “The offspring had significantly lower levels of vitamin D 64.3 (63.1– 65.4) compared with controls 68.5 (66.0–71.1), independent of possible confounding factors.

    These results cast doubt on the causal nature of previously reported
    associations between low levels of vitamin D and age-related diseases
    and mortality”

    For anyone wondering the normal range of Vitamin D (the active kind) is 50-140 nmol/l

    TL;DR None of these people had LOW LEVELS of vitamin D, they just had slightly lower, but still normal levels of Vitamin D.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100004577887621 Kim Dolla

    Men have more pressing problems: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4zSRkBMPng

    • shawn_von_socialist

      misandrist <3

  • http://profiles.google.com/hibbard.tyler Tyler Hibbard

    I’m confused. Does this mean Vitamin D makes you live longer, or not as long?

    • http://twitter.com/JNavarr0 Jose Nav

      Try not getting Vitamin D in your system and see how long you live. Vitamin D (sun) is essential for just about everything in health.

  • Review_Crew

    This article is poorly written. It is not clear that the study revealed low levels or high levels where the reason for a longer life span. Futhermore, the control groups were too small to take this study seriously. There should be a video of a man standing with a flashlight saying… “move along, nothing to see here.”