Study Sheds New Light on Common Ancestor of All Jawed Vertebrates

Jun 15, 2012 by Sci-News.com

Re-analysis of the braincase of Acanthodes bronni has revealed that this 290-million-year-old fossil fish resembled a shark.

The fossilized braincase of Acanthodes bronni and artist’s impression of the ancient fish (Michael Coates / Nobu Tamura)

The new study, published in Nature, sheds light on the evolution of the earliest jawed vertebrates and offers a new glimpse of the last common ancestor before the split between the earliest sharks and the first bony fishes – the lineage that would eventually include human beings.

“Unexpectedly, Acanthodes turns out to be the best view we have of conditions in the last common ancestor of bony fishes and sharks,” said senior author Michael Coates, a professor of organismal biology and anatomy at the University of Chicago. “Our work is telling us that the earliest bony fishes looked pretty much like sharks, and not vice versa. What we might think of as shark space is, in fact, general modern jawed vertebrate space.”

The group gnathostomes, meaning “jaw-mouths,” includes tens of thousands of living vertebrate species, ranging from fish and sharks to birds, reptiles, mammals and humans. Cartilaginous fish, which today include sharks, rays, and ratfish, diverged from the bony fishes more than 420 million years ago. But little is known about what the last common ancestor of humans, manta rays and great white sharks looked like.

Prof Coates and his colleagues found answers to this mystery in an unexpected place: the acanthodians, extinct fishes that generally left behind only tiny scales and elaborate suites of fin spines. But armed with new data on what the earliest sharks and bony fishes looked like, the team re-examined fossils of Acanthodes bronni, the best-preserved acanthodian species.

Study lead author Dr Davis created highly detailed latex molds of specimens revealing the inside and outside of the skull, providing a valuable new data set for assessing cranial and jaw anatomy as well as the organizations of sensory, circulatory and respiratory systems in the species.

“We want to explore braincases if possible, because they are exceptionally rich sources of anatomical information,” Prof Coates said. “They’re much better than scales, teeth or fin spines, which, on their own, tend to deliver a confusing signal of evolutionary relationships.”

The analysis of the sample combined with recent CT scans of skulls from early sharks and bony fishes led the team to a surprising reassessment of what Acanthodes bronni tells us about the history of jawed vertebrates.

“For the first time, we could look inside the head of Acanthodes, and describe it within this whole new context,” Prof Coates said. “The more we looked at it, the more similarities we found with sharks.”

However, analysis of the evolutionary relationships of Acanthodes bronni – even with these new data added – still connected this species to early bony fishes. Meanwhile, some acanthodian species turned out to be primitive sharks, while others were relatives of the common ancestor of sharks and bony fishes.

This result explains some of the longstanding confusion about the placement of acanthodians in vertebrate history. But additional analyses went a step further. Using more than 100 morphological characters, the researchers quantified the mutual resemblance among the earliest jawed fishes. Acanthodians as a whole, including the earliest members of humans’ own deep evolutionary past, appear to cluster with ancient sharks.

_______

Bibliographic information: Davis S.P., Finarelli J.A., Coates M.I. 2012. Acanthodes and shark-like conditions in the last common ancestor of modern gnathostomes. Nature 486, 247–250 (14 June 2012); doi:10.1038/nature11080